الخميس، 22 سبتمبر، 2011

Kids Having Babies

Kids with Kids
 
I happened to catch a video on youtube titled, “Kids Having Babies” and it was about just that. It began by stating that a school in America had 17 girls get pregnant and that it was “no accident”, after this statement they showed a clip from the film "Juno", where she playfully remarks on the "positive" marker on her pregnancy test (so much fun!) So it's no surprise that the video began mentioning teen pregnancy and the media.

Since so many young people grow up in front of a television set, it’s pretty damn important.

Then, text comes on the screen stating that the U.S has the highest rate of teenage pregnancy of all developed countries. Afterwards, it follows a 14 year old girl who appears to be quite far along in her pregnancy and films the nurse speaking to her. The girl talks about how her friend can see the baby moving on the stomach and that she can’t, indicating that pregnancy is not uncommon in her group of friends. The nurse says that teen pregnancy is such a large problem because people like her - people who belong to the public health sector, have not done enough in terms of birth control education. From what I hear about the U.S, sex education is not very comprehensive.The nurse states that once a month girls come to her for pregnancy tests, at the end of every cycle. This obviously is illustrating that these young girls are having sex and risking pregnancy nearly every time, likely from lack of sexual education.
I dolefully remember that in high school, some of the girls in my grade were having sex as early as grade 7 and 8 (I’m not kidding). I would ask how they stay safe and they would say condoms or the “pull out” method. None of them seemed to be on the birth control pill until much later, which I assume has a lot to do with them not wanting to tell their parents or doctors that they were indeed having sex. However, I don’t think at 12 or 13 years old that anyone, male or female really grasps the concept of sex and probably assumes a condom will work 100% of the time or pulling out is a good form of birth control. Since I had a small class, only a few girls got pregnant, the youngest being 15.
Nevertheless, in the video the nurse talks about the girls actually wanting to have the children; to have someone to love them unconditionally. I have heard this a lot and I clearly can’t say this is true for every young girl - I don’t work with pregnant teens and I don’t know the exact statistics. Regardless, I think this whole idea of “wanting a baby” comes from a lack of education on sex, birth control and relationships. Often, at least from what I remember of sexual education, we as girls were never talked to about forming sexual relationships or about boys pressuring us into sex, particularly older boys. It seemed to me that most of the girls who were having sex in my class were having sex with older boys, not with their peers.
The young girl in the video tells the nurse that the baby was a plan, she and her 17 year old boyfriend had planned to have a child. The nurse asked if she was happy about the plan, and she said “kind of”, she said she felt she was too young but did not feel that way until after she became pregnant.

What upset me the most was when the nursed asked, “Will he be there for the birth?”
The young girl responded, “No
Now, I’m not speaking for everyone, but I know I was a hell of a lot different at 14 than I was at 17. Both are young, but 14 is just a baby, most girls have just started their period a year prior to that. I believe not only is there a lack of birth control options and education but also a lack of communication surrounding relationships. There’s so much pressure at this age to feel the need to impress the opposite sex, to feel desired or loved. I think it’s horrible that we are to feel this way as young girls, it shouldn’t be so. It seems from the time you hit about 12, life becomes about getting attention, competing with other girls and hating your body. It depresses me just to think about my self-concept at 14 years old.
Yet, the nurses, doctors, teachers, and parents want to pretend this isn’t the reality for young girls, and because of that they cover their eyes and plug their ears. The result is that these girls are getting into abusive relationships, becoming pregnant, and spending their all of their energy trying to look “sexy” instead of having fun and getting an education. Caregivers will repeat like broken records that it is "normal young female behavior." It's normal for young girls to spend all their time obsessing about sexual relationships, buying and wearing pounds of makeup and starving themselves. I think it's bullshit - not some natural phenomenon.
The video claims that America’s teen pregnancies are on the rise for the first time since 1991. This is sad. What caused the decline for such a long time and what is causing the increase? I speculate the lack of comprehensive sexual education in ALL states and the amount of new media emerging since 1991. The influence of the media and how it tries so hard to sexualize girls has huge implications. The media is powerful in changing minds and behaviors and since the message to young girls is “find a hot boyfriend, please him, and make sure you’re sexually attractive”, the adolescent forecast is looking pretty stormy.
by Owl Eyes at 6:38 PM


Pregnancy Pact!?! You're Only 15


I'm seventeen years old and a senior in high school. I recently had a baby.

My friend Brittany, also had a baby. We were the first ones in years to ever be pregnant in our high school.

Brittany mentioned to me the other day that a few girls two grades lower than us are starting a pregnancy pact to have babies by the time they are done with high school.

I, myself, am struggling with the open adoption I'm going through with my daughter. And to hear such arrogance from little girls who have no idea what they are getting into.

My situation, is different than other teen moms, so I'm not judging the fact that they want kids, but the way they are going about it is just insanity.



16 and Pregnant Recap: Surprise! Izabella’s Eight Months Pregnant
Written By Lauren 1 Jun 2011


Tuesday’s 16 and Pregnant introduces us to Izabella Tovar and her boyfriend Jairo Rodriguez from Draper, Utah. Izabella lives at home with very supportive parents and is a rising sophomore at a local Catholic school. She has spent the summer hanging out with Jairo, her boyfriend of three months and avoiding her friends, as she is trying to keep her pregnancy a secret. The couple is expecting a boy in September.

At seven and a half months, Izabella goes to visit her best friend Cassidy, and her bump reveals why she’s there before she even needs to say a word. Cassidy admits that she had heard rumors of her friend’s pregnancy but was waiting to hear it from her. Cassidy promises to help Izabella maintain her studies. Her parents take a cue from Izabella and Cassidy and decide to spill the beans to the rest of the family. Her uncle paints a pretty harsh, yet spot-on, description of what likely lies ahead for the young couple.

Izabella makes her first public appearance at church, and her parents decide to throw her a baby shower so she can see more of her school friends, since she is currently working on assignments from home. Izabella is excited to be able to catch up with her friends, but she’s disappointed that Cassidy is a no-show.

At a family dinner, Izabella’s father Erik says he is disappointed in his wife, Vi, because of how lenient she has been with their daughter. He says he somewhat blames Vi for being more of a friend than a mother and should have talked to Izabella more about sex and its consequences. I am totally drinking his Kool-Aid until I realize, um, he could have done the same. I understand the bond of mothers and daughters, but if he thought his wife was too concerned with being a buddy, Erik could have stepped in to be the parent.

Cassidy has been avoiding Izabella since missing the baby shower. Izabella is upset but has to other things to think about as she and Jairo head to her thirty-eight week check-up and her blood pressure is high. To avoid any potential complications, the doctor decides to induce Izabella at the end of the week. With this news, the couple must decide quickly their next move. Luckily, Izabella’s mom runs a daycare, so childcare isn’t an issue, but of course, Jairo is moving in with his pregnant girlfriend. Thankfully, Izabella’s parents put two big stipulations on their new tenant–he must keep up with his studies and enroll in college, and he WILL NOT be sharing a bed with their daughter (a little late for that rule, but what can you do?).

The couple gets an early start on September 17th, induction day. They head to the hospital as soon as Izabella blow dries Jairo’s hair (??). As labor begins, Jairo admits he doesn’t want to see any of the birthing business and plans to stay up near Izabella’s head. After fourteen hours of labor, she is finally able to start pushing, and sixteen hours in, there is still no baby. Her doctor is extra chirpy, and after a final pep talk and push, Enrique Jairo is born.

Jairo takes to fatherhood, and while Izabella is disappointed that none of her friends come to visit, her biggest supporter comes in the form of Jairo’s cousin. He comes to see the young couple and talks about his first few weeks in college, his political science major, and his plans to go to law school. He lectures Jairo on the importance of choosing a path that will benefit his new child, and tells Jairo he better not raise the baby like a little gangtser. Izabella would do well to have this cousin baby-sit often!

It’s exhausting for both Jairo and Izabella, but they work well together. The couple prepares to head back to school, Izabella to high school and Jairo to community college. Izabella’s uncle comes down hard on Izabella’s family for supporting the couple while they go to school. The uncle feels like Jairo should go to work to support his new family. While I see his point, Izabella’s dad thinks the couple will fare better in the long run with an education, and I see his point even more. Here’s hoping Jairo keeps up his end of the bargain.

On her first day back to school, Izabella tries to clear the air with her best friend. Cassidy admits that she was distant because her feelings were hurt that Izabella kept her pregnancy a secret. An angry Jairo picks Izabella up from school, and something tells me that his college enrollment didn’t go as planned. He totally shuts down when Izabella tries to talk to him, and he storms out and leaves the house. When Jairo returns, the family sits down to talk to him. An embarrassed (and rightfully so) Jairo admits that he has been lying to everyone about finishing high school online, and has in fact not graduated.

Erik takes his daughter to dinner to discuss the gravity of Jairo’s actions. He sits down with Jairo and sets forth a pretty fair game plan as to Jairo’s schooling and the couple’s living situation. The episode ends with the young couple with Enrique at the baby’s Baptism and Izabella reflecting on the importance of having such a supportive family.


On Mtv’s aftershow, Izabella reveals that she kept her pregnancy a secret because she had seen how badly a fellow classmate had been treated when she became pregnant a few months before Izabella. Izabella is still with Jairo, calling him “amazing.” He is working, going to school and helping raise Enrique. Izabella herself says she did not expect to see such a change in the young father, but the new family seems to be thriving with the support of her parents.



What are your thoughts? How can i stop them or help them
 

الأحد، 4 سبتمبر، 2011

Exploiting Norway’s Terror

Exploiting Norway’s Terror
 
By Maidhc Ó Cathail
In the wake of any major terrorist event, it’s generally worth noting who is especially quick off the mark to exploit the tragedy.

Within hours of planes striking the World Trade Center on 9/11, the then former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak was in the BBC’s London studios calling for a “war on terror” against “rogue states” which just happened to be enemies of Israel (none of whose agents, unlike Israel’s, were seen filming and celebrating as the twin towers collapsed into their own footprint). And soon after ICTS International, an Israeli security firm established by former intelligence officers, allowed a young Nigerian without a passport to “slip through” Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport to board Northwest Flight 253 on Christmas Day two years ago, former Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, the son of a suspected Mossad operative, was on CNN touting one of his client’s full-body scanners as the answer to America’s airline security problems.

In the case of the July 22 twin terror attacks in Oslo and on Utøya Island, however, some of Israel’s more provocative propagandists appear to have been wrong-footed by Anders Behring Breivik’s apparent admiration for their Islamophobic rants. While the likes of Bat Ye’or, Daniel Pipes and Pamela Geller were seen scrambling to distance themselves from Breivik, Norway’s massacre has indeed been seized upon by others with their own, albeit less transparent, ties to the Jewish state.

During visits to two European capitals over the following week, Poland’s staunchly pro-Israel foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, appeared to be particularly exercised by the tragedy. While in London for discussions about the Polish Presidency of the Council of the European Union and the EU’s Eastern European policy, Sikorski took a swipe at some of his critics in Poland, where he claimed “there is no lack of people who think like Behring Breivik, a man who shot at his own people in order to bring down a government he believed had lost its political and legal right to govern.” The foreign minister, one of the highest-ranking Polish leaders not on board the plane that crashed killing much of Warsaw’s political and military leadership last year, said that his country also has “groups who believe that the democratically elected president and government are traitors who have no real interest in Poland or the Polish people. These are very dangerous emotions which, if stoked, could have unpredictable consequences.” As an example of such “dangerous emotions,” Sikorski cited an ongoing court case in which he is suing a couple of Polish newspapers for failing to remove readers’ anti-Semitic comments about his wife, Anne Applebaum.

Later in Brussels, before an emergency meeting of counter-terrorism officials on how to combat attacks such as Norway’s, the Polish foreign minister repeated his allegations during a press conference with his British counterpart, William Hague. Claiming that “certain political parties had expressed their approval of the terrorist,” Sikorski went on to cite the internet as “a potentially sinister tool for those bent on propagating agendas of hate.” Referring again to the remarks made online about his wife, he described the net as a “cesspool.”

The Polish foreign minister’s legal crusade against “dangerous emotions” had already received a significant endorsement in a May 11 op-ed piece in The Economist magazine from someone writing under the pseudonym “E.L.,” who described Sikorski as “an old friend of mine.”  Reproducing one such comment in Polish which was considered “simply too unpleasant to translate,” E.L. cited “another rather milder one” which “merely accuses Mr Sikorski of being the ‘husband of an orthodox Jew, an enemy of Poland controlled by his father-in-law,’ bent on the ‘the destruction and destabilisation of Poland’ and a ‘hidden, ruthless traitor.’” Having disclosed that Sikorski was an “old friend,” E.L. somehow neglected to mention that the Polish foreign minister’s wife accused of betraying Poland to foreign interests is a former editor of The Economist. As for the op-ed writer’s own identity, it may be more than a coincidence that the name of the holding company owned by Sir Evelyn de Rothschild and his wife, Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, which manages its investments in The Economist Group, owner of The Economist magazine, is E.L. Rothschild.

Sikorski’s allegedly influential father-in-law, Harvey Applebaum, is a partner in Covington and Burling, an international law firm which advises multinational corporations on significant transactional, litigation, regulatory, and public policy matters. Among its more controversial clients are Chiquita, the first major U.S. corporation to be convicted of financing terrorism; and Halliburton and Xe Services (formerly Blackwater), two of the biggest beneficiaries of the “war on terror.” Its current and former attorneys include such proficient pro-Israeli warmongers as John Bolton, senior fellow at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute (a former employer of both Mr. and Mrs. Sikorski); Stuart Eizenstat, Special U.S. Envoy for Holocaust Issues during the Clinton administrations; and the aforementioned Michael Chertoff.

Having covered the demise of the Soviet Union as a Warsaw-based correspondent for The Economist during the late 1980s, Anne Applebaum has long been one of the most prominent anti-Russian advocates of economic and political “liberalisation” in the former Soviet Bloc and beyond. In a 2004 op-ed in The Washington Post, she dismissed as “Freedom Haters” those who saw “insidious neocon plots” behind the supposedly disinterested “democracy promotion” of George Soros and what she sarcastically referred to as “the evil triumvirate” of the National Democratic Institute, the International Republican Institute and Freedom House, which she praised for “diligently training judges, helping election monitors and funding human rights groups around the world for decades, much of the time without getting much attention for it.”  Prefiguring her husband’s current concerns, Applebaum bemoaned “the international echo chamber that the Internet has become” in which such cynical ideas “have traction.”

In the wake of Norway’s terror, Anne Applebaum’s response was as swift as it was revealing. Within 48 hours, she had an op-ed piece in The Washington Post entitled “Norway massacre and anti-government obsession.” Sounding a similar note to Sikorski, she opined that Breivik’s obsessions “sprang from an insane conviction that his own government was illegitimate.” Applebaum, however, seemed more concerned about Americans who might think like Breivik. Coining the term “illegitimists” to describe Breivik’s supposed American analogues, she cited Birthers, who claim that Barack Obama isn’t American-born, as the contemporary right-wing manifestation. “It is not accidental,” Applebaum observed, “that the one note of sympathy for Breivik in the U.S. media came from the birtherist and illegitimist Glenn Beck, who helpfully compared the young Norwegians murdered by Breivik to Hitler youth. Presumably if they are Hitler youth, then they deserved to die?”

It is hardly accidental either that Applebaum, who has lauded Daniel Pipes as “one of the best” American analysts of the Middle East, omitted to mention that the Birther movement is spearheaded by Orly Taitz, a Soviet Jewish emigré and pro-Israel activist who had lived in Israel for years prior to her inciting Americans against their president; or that Glenn Beck — whose over-the-top exposés of influential figures such as George Soros conveniently serve to discredit more measured critiques — is engaged in a mutual love affair with the Israeli right-wing, whose backing has been crucial to his lucrative career of demagoguery.

After the Norway massacre, of course, it’s going be even harder for genuine critics of government to publicly express their displeasure. From now on, anyone who questions the bona fides of such avid “freedom lovers” as the Sikorskis and their powerful transnational associates risks being labelled a potential “Breivik” whose “dangerous emotions” need to be kept in check.

Maidhc Ó Cathail is an investigative journalist and Middle East analyst 
 
tryals Tony Ryals says:

Dear Maidhc Ó Cathail,
ICTS Europe,(the same as ICTS International),was also doing some
‘security’ work during the London subway bombings and also allowed
both Richard Reid the shoe bomber to board a flight from De Gualle
shortly after 911 as well as the Islamic crotch bomber Mutallab to
board flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas 2009 and had a
‘security’ role at Moscow airport earlier this year when a supposed
Islamic bomber killed over 30 people – I thought you would find it of
some interest that according to ICTS’ own website,they also play some
unexplained ‘security’ role in Norway as well.
Because I respect and appreciate your investigative writing that has
also been posted on Gordon Duff’s,et.al.’s,veteranstoday.con website I
also wanted to bring to your attention the fact that their writer Gilad
Artzmon appears to be a relative of both Menachem Atmon of ICTS infamy
as well as Tzipora (Tzipi) Malka Livni of Israeli war crimes
infamy.Gordon Duff appears himself connected to ex CIA George Tenet
with all his ties to lies of 911 as well as to the CIA stock fraud and
money laundering In Q Tel and Agora Inc of Baltimore,,(that may or not
be related to Agora newspaper monopoly of Poland), which explains
why Duff placed Agora´s Lila Rajiva as a staff writer until I raised
internet hell about it.Certainly not your fault that they would use
your good investigative reporting to bolster their credibility but in
light of Gilad Atzmon’s undisclosed relations to the upper levels of
Israeli fascism and to people who had direct roles in 911 and probably
London subway bombings as well as Richard Reid the shoe bomber and
Mutalab the Islamic crotch bomber and possibly a role in Moscow
airport bombing earlier this year,etc,such as his relative Atzmon of
ICTS International or ICTS Europe,it would be in all our interest if
you investigated my contentions and verify for yourself.
AND AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THEIR OWN WEBSITE THEY BRAG OF
SOME UNEXPLAINED ´SECURITY´WORK IN NORWAY AS WELL.

Contact ICTS Europe Systems
http://www.ictseuropesystems.com/contact.html If you would like to
receive further information about ICTS Europe Systems, or have us
contact you in relation to … Norway, ICTS Norway S/A,
http://www.ictsnorway.no …

ICTS Norway – [ Translate this page ]
http://www.ictsnorway.no/ – Cached Marknadskommunikation med fokus på
Internet och varumärken.:

ICTS-International Consultants Wed Targeted Security has long been
synonymous with air safety – Aviation Security. ICTS is a world leader
in this area and has during the last two decades gained a prestigious
reputation for its professional integrity, service, quality,
innovation and commercial success in their various businesses.

ICTS was formed in 1982 and has since become the market leader when it
comes to safeguarding services within the aviation industry. Year 2003
encompassed ICTS Europe for more than 700 000 flights

Jerzy Ulicki-Rek says:

Please let me set it clear and straight:”Sikorski “and his wife are Jews.Poland as a country is under Jewish occupation since 1945.Occupation delivered on the bayonets of Red Army.
Until 1989 the was some sort of balance of power in government mafia :some were Jewish bastards and some were “ours” .Same as in Moscow where was the decision center.
In 1968 “our” bastards were strong enough to get rid of most of the Jewish bastards.
People’s”Solidarity” movement ,was taken over from the beginning almost by Jews from “K.O.R. (Komitee to Defened the Workers)like J.Kuron,Geremek,Mazowiecki.
Jews used the manipulated “Solidarity” as a tool to force “our’ bastards to share the power in the country.
Real and honest people from Solidarity were force to emigrate.
After 1989 (“round table agreement”) Jews have absolute power and are selling the country in bulk.
Industry(shipyards,harbors) which were doing well even under wasteful “communism” system collapsed all of sudden.
Poles are under Jewish occupation .
Those who could create any danger to a status quo (A.Lepper,leader of “Samoobrona(“Self defence) -the last victim) are murdered by suicide.

realted link

america and Israel’s Gift that Keeps on Giving–Female Trafficking Soars in Iraq

George Bush and Israel’s Gift that Keeps on Giving–Female Trafficking Soars in Iraq
 
By Rebecca Murray
Al-Battaween, the red light street in Baghdad.
Rania was 16 years old when officials raped her during Saddam Hussein’s 1991 crackdown in Iraq’s Shia south. “My brothers were sentenced to death, and the price to stop this was to offer my body,” she says.

Cast out for bringing ‘shame’ to her family, Rania ran away to Baghdad and soon fell into living and working in Baghdad’s red light district.

Prostitution and sex trafficking are epidemic in Iraq, where the violence of military occupation and sectarian strife have smashed national institutions, impoverished the population and torn apart families and neighbourhoods. Over 100,000 civilians have been killed and an estimated 4.4 million Iraqis displaced since 2003.

“Wars and conflicts, wherever they are fought, invariably usher in sickeningly high level of violence against women and girls,” Amnesty International states.

Rania worked her way up as a sex trafficker’s deputy, collecting money from clients. “If I had four girls, and about 200 clients a day – it could be about 50 clients for each one of them,” she explains.

Sex costs about 100 dollars a session now, Rania says. Many virgin teenage girls are sold for around 5,000 dollars, and trafficked to popular destinations like northern Iraq, Syria and the United Arab Emirates. Non-virgins are about half that price.

Girls who run away to escape domestic violence or forced marriage are the most vulnerable prey for men working for pimps in bus stations and taxi stands. Some girls are also sold into marriages by family relatives, only to be handed over to trafficking rings.

Most of Iraq’s sex traffickers are predominantly female, running squalid brothels in neighbourhoods like the decrepit Al-Battaween district in central Baghdad.

Six years ago, a raid by U.S. troops on Rania’s brothel brought her nefarious career to an abrupt end. The prostitutes were charged along with everyone else for abetting terrorism.

Imprisonment changed Rania’s life. While she served time in Baghdad’s Al-Kadimiyah lock-up – where more than half the female inmates serve time for prostitution – a local women’s support group befriended her. Today she works for them as an undercover researcher, drawing on her years of experience and connections to infiltrate brothels throughout Iraq.

“I deal with all these pimps and sex traffickers,” Rania says, covered in black, with black, lacquered fingernails and gold bracelets. “I don’t tell them I’m an activist, I tell them I am a sex trafficker. This is the only way for me to get information. If they discover that I’m an activist I get killed.”

In one harrowing experience, Rania and two other girls visited a house in Baghdad’s Al-Jihad district, where girls as young as 16 were held to cater exclusively to the U.S. military. The brothel’s owner told Rania that an Iraqi interpreter employed by the Americans served as the go-between, transporting girls to and from the U.S. airport base.

Rania’s co-workers covertly took photos of the captive teenagers with their mobile phones, but were caught. “One girl went crazy,” Rania recalls. “She accused us of spying. I don’t know how we escaped,” she exclaims. “We had to run away – barefoot!”

Before the Gulf War in 1991, Iraq enjoyed the highest female literacy rate across the Middle East, and more Iraqi women were employed in skilled professions, like medicine and education, than in any other country in the region.

Twenty years later Iraqi women experience a very different reality. Sharia law increasing dominates everyday life, with issues like marriage, divorce and honour crimes implemented outside of the court system, and adherence to state law.

“Many factors combined to promote the rise of sex trafficking and prostitution in the area,” a Norwegian Church Aid report said last year.

“The US-led war and the chaos it has generated; the growing insecurity and lawlessness; corruption of authorities; the upsurge in religious extremism; economic hardship; marriage pressures; gender based violence and recurrent discrimination suffered by women; kidnappings of girls and women; the impunity of perpetrators of crimes, especially those against women; and the development of new technologies associated with the globalisation of the sex industry.”

The International Organisation of Migration (IOM) estimates 800,000 humans are trafficked across borders annually, but statistics within Iraq are very difficult to pin down.

Although the Iraqi constitution deems trafficking illegal, there are no criminal laws that effectively prosecute offenders. Perversely, it is often the victims of trafficking and prostitution that are punished.

IOM is currently working with an inter-ministerial panel to lobby for a new reading of the revised counter-trafficking law, which has been stalled by the government since 2009.

“We have reports about trafficking both inside and out of Iraq,” says senior deputy minister, Judge Asghar Al-Musawi, at the Ministry of Migration and Displacement.

“However, I admit that Iraqi government institutions are not mature enough to deal with this topic yet, as the departments are still in their growing phase.”

Human Rights Watch (HRW) says the government has done little to combat the issue. “This is a phenomenon that wasn’t prevalent in 2003,” says HRW researcher, Samer Muscati.

“We don’t have specific statistics. This is the first part to tackle the problem; we need to know how significant and widespread the problem is. This is something the government hasn’t been doing. It hasn’t monitored or cracked down on traffickers, and because of that there is this black hole in terms of information.”

Zeina, 18, is an example of an invisible statistic. According to the local Organisation of Women’s Freedom in Iraq (OWFI), she was 13 when her grandfather sold her to a sex trafficker in Dubai for 6,000 dollars. She performed only oral sex with customers until a wealthy man paid 4,000 dollars to take her virginity for one night.

After four years of prostitution, Zeina finally escaped the United Arab Emirates and returned back to her parents in Baghdad. She approached the authorities and took her grandfather to court. However, Zeina has since disappeared. OWFI has learned she was sold again, this time by her mother to a sex trafficker in Erbil.

OWFI director Yanar Mohammed says her office has been threatened for their advocacy against the lucrative trafficking industry, especially reporting on an infamous brothel owner in Al-Battaween district known as Emam.

“In each house there are almost 45 women and it is such a chaotic scene where women get treated like a cheap meat market,” describes Mohammed. “You step into the house and see women being exploited sexually, even not behind closed doors. So the woman who runs these houses makes an incredible income, and has a crew around her to protect what she does.”

Emam is said to enjoy close ties with the Interior Ministry, and has never had one of her four houses shut down. Despite OWFI’s expose, her operations are unaffected.

Mohammed sighs. “Iraq has a whole generation of women who are in their teens now, whose bodies have been turned into battlefields from criminal ideologies
 
realted links

This month America’s deadliest in long Afghan war

 This month America’s deadliest in long Afghan war
 
Associated Press
August has become the deadliest month yet for U.S. forces in the nearly 10-year-old war in Afghanistan, increasing pressure on the Obama administration to bring troops home sooner rather than later.

The 66 U.S. service members killed this month eclipses the previous record of 65 killed in July 2010, according to an Associated Press tally. Nearly half the August deaths occurred when insurgents shot down a Chinook helicopter Aug. 6, killing 30 American troops, mostly elite Navy SEALs.

Violence is being reported across Afghanistan despite the U.S.-led coalition’s drive to rout insurgents from their strongholds in the south.

Though American military officials predicted high casualties this summer as the Taliban try to come back after recent offensives, the grim milestone increases pressure on the Obama administration to withdraw U.S. forces quickly.

The military has begun to implement President Barack Obama’s order to withdraw the 33,000 extra troops he dispatched to the war. He ordered 10,000 out this year and another 23,000 withdrawn by the summer of 2012, leaving about 68,000 U.S. troops on the ground. Although major combat units are not expected to start leaving until late fall, two National Guard regiments comprising about 1,000 soldiers started going home last month.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has set the end of 2014 as the target date for Afghan police and soldiers to take the lead in protecting and defending the country, leaving international combat forces to go home or take on more support roles.

In a speech in Minnesota on Tuesday, Obama honored all the troops who have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“As our mission transitions from combat to support, Afghans will take responsibility for their own security and the longest war in American history will come to a responsible end,” Obama said at the American Legion’s national convention in Minneapolis. “For our troops and military families who have sacrificed so much, this means relief from an unrelenting decade of operations.”

Aside from the 30 Americans killed in the Chinook crash southwest of Kabul, 23 died this month in Kandahar and Helmand provinces in southern Afghanistan, the main focus of Afghan and U.S.-led coalition forces. The remaining 13 were killed in eastern Afghanistan.

Former U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Ronald Neumann, said the recent spike in violence does not tell policymakers much on its own, yet could still have the effect of intensifying the sense of frustration about the war in Congress and elsewhere. Some U.S. lawmakers see the war’s duration and cost as a “nuisance” in a time of tight U.S. budgets, he said. “That reinforces the negative,” he said.

Jeff Dressler, a senior research analyst studying Afghanistan at the Institute for the Study of War in Washington, said August’s high casualty count must be put in context.

“We are right now in the height of the fighting season. Despite progress in Helmand and Kandahar, there continues to be tough fighting down there as coalition forces consolidate their gains and transition areas of those provinces to Afghan lead,” he said, referring to Afghan police and soldiers eventually taking responsibility for security in certain areas.

“We have to look at what commanders were saying all along throughout the course of the year — that we’re really not going to know until October, at the end of this fighting season, how much progress we’ve had,” Dressler said.

Besides the 66 Americans killed so far this month, the NATO coalition suffered the loss of 14 other troops: two British, four French, one New Zealander, one Australian, one Polish and five others whose nationalities have not yet been disclosed.

So far this year, 403 international service members, including at least 299 Americans, have been killed in Afghanistan.

السبت، 3 سبتمبر، 2011

Flight 77 did NOT hit the Pentagon

Flight 77 did NOT hit the Pentagon
The official government and media conspiracy theory says that American Airlines Flight 77 was hijacked by 5 fanatical Islamic terrorists on 9/11, and flown into the Pentagon, killing all 64 people on board along with 125 people in the Pentagon.  From Wikipedia:

    American Airlines Flight 77 was American Airlines’ morning, daily scheduled transcontinental flight, from Washington Dulles International Airport, in Dulles, Virginia to Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California. On September 11, 2001, the aircraft flying this route—a Boeing 757-223—was hijacked by five al-Qaeda terrorists and deliberately crashed into the Pentagon, as part of the September 11 attacks.

    Less than 35 minutes into the flight, the hijackers stormed the cockpit and forced the passengers to the rear of the aircraft. Hani Hanjour, one of the hijackers who was trained as a pilot, assumed control of the flight. Unknown to the hijackers, passengers aboard were able to make telephone calls to loved ones and relay information on the hijacking.

    The aircraft crashed into the western side of the Pentagon at 09:37 EDT. All 64 people on board the aircraft, including the hijackers, were killed, as were 125 people in the building. Dozens of people witnessed the crash and news sources began reporting on the incident within minutes. The impact severely damaged an area of the Pentagon and ignited a large fire. A portion of the Pentagon collapsed; firefighters spent days trying to fully extinguish the blaze. The damaged sections of the Pentagon were rebuilt in 2002, with occupants moving back into the completed areas on August 15, 2002.

    The 184 victims of the attack are memorialized in the Pentagon Memorial adjacent to the Pentagon. The 1.93-acre (7,800 m2) park contains a bench for each of the victims, arranged according to their year of birth, ranging from 1930 (aged 71) to 1998 (aged 3).

Upon further investigation, there is no evidence to support any of these claims.  For starters, let’s have a listen to what CNN Pentagon correspondent Jamie McIntyre had to say about what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11:

    From my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

    The only site, is the actual side of the building that’s crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.

    Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn’t happen immediately. It wasn’t until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.

After the U.S. Justice Department released the rather pathetic photos supposedly showing Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, Jamie McIntrye had a change of heart:

McIntrye’s rather Orwellian about face should not surprise anyone.  9/11 was a hectic day, and not everyone had their script in front of them, including McIntyre.  After all, it’s been common knowledge for years
now that the CIA has completely infiltrated the major corporate-owned media in this country, and that Pentagon psychological warfare specialists have conducted major operations via the corporate-owned media, including operations directed at the American public.  Former CIA director William Colby has been quoted as saying, “The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” Below, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now, a major leftist limited hangout/disinformation outlet which refuses to address the overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence proving 9/11 was an inside job, interviews Col. Sam Gardiner and Peter Hart, who have exposed the Pentagon’s successful propaganda efforts in recent years using the major media of this country.
Criminal elements of the media clearly were and remain involved in the 9/11 deception and cover up.

In Enver Masud’s “Pentagon Transcripts, Official Records Belie ‘The 9/11 Commission Report’,” we learn:

    I live less than a mile from the Pentagon, and began examining this issue in early 2002. The first question I asked when I looked at the Pentagon shortly after that tragic day in 2001 was, “where’s the plane?”

    I began to suspect the official account of 9/11 when I learned that the U.S. war on Afghanistan was apparently planned prior to September 11, and possibly after U.S. negotiations with the Taliban for a pipeline broke down.

    According to the BBC (September 18, 2001), Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October. [...]

    Writing in “9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out,” Kwiatowski noted, “a strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense, who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a ‘missile’.”

    Pentagon employee April Gallop, whose “desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane allegedly hit the outside wall” stated in a sworn complaint (before the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York):

    “As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. Hit in the head, she was able to grab the baby and make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no airplane wreckage and no burning airplane fuel anywhere; only rubble and dust.”

    Barbara Honegger, military affairs journalist, reported in her personal capacity that a pilot sent by Gen Larry Arnold (NORAD) “reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building.” She added, “Multiple standard-issue, battery-operated wall clocks . . . stopped between 9:31 and 9:32-1/2 on September 11.” [...]

Masud emphasizes the importance of the September 12th and September 15th, 2001 Pentagon news briefings, and what they revealed:

    At the September 12, 2001, Dept. of Defense (DoD) News Briefing by Assistant Secretary of Defense, Victoria Clarke, Ed Plaugher (fire chief of Arlington County), and others, “American Airlines”, “Flight 77″, “Boeing 757″ were not even mentioned.

    How significant is this?

    With the world’s news media assembled at the Pentagon on the day after the alleged attack on the Pentagon by Arab hijackers flying American Airlines Flight 77 — a Boeing 757 — “American Airlines”, “Flight 77″, “Boeing 757″ were not considered important enough to mention at the Pentagon News Briefing the day after the alleged attack!

    Fire chief Ed Plaugher was asked by a reporter, “Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?” Plaugherresponded, “there are some small pieces of aircraft … there’s no fuselage sections and that sort of thing.”

    When asked, “Chief, there are small pieces of the plane virtually all over, out over the highway, tiny pieces. Would you say the plane exploded, virtually exploded on impact due to the fuel”, Plaugher responded “You know, I’d rather not comment on that.” [...]

    At the September 15, 2001, Dept. of Defense (DoD) News Briefing by Mr. Lee Evey, Pentagon Renovation Manager, Rear Adm. Craig R. Quigley, deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, and others, it was apparent that there were lingering doubts about what had struck the Pentagon on September 11.

    When Mr. Evey said, “the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C Ring”, a reporter asked, “One thing that’s confusing — if it came in the way you described, at an angle, why then are not the wings outside? I mean, the wings would have shorn off. The tail would have shorn off. And yet there’s apparently no evidence of the aircraft outside the E Ring.” Evey replied, “Actually, there’s considerable evidence of the aircraft outside the E Ring. It’s just not very visible.”

    Apparently, no one asked how “the nose of the aircraft” (a relatively weak component of the aircraft) remained sufficiently intact to penetrate the C Ring — the E Ring is the outermost ring.

Dr. James Fetzer has explained in detail the fact that a Boeing 757, even piloted by an experienced and well-trained pilot (which was not the case with Hani Hanjour, the alleged Arab hijacker that flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon), could not possibly perform the feats described by the official government conspiracy theory:

    The probability that a real Boeing 757 could have hit the Pentagon and not left debris from its wings and tail or even its engines-not to mention bodies, seats, and luggage-is zero. The probability that the alleged trajectory could have been flown in violation of the laws of aerodynamics is even less than zero-since violations of these laws is not physically possible. The probability that the trajectory, if it were possible, could have left a smooth, green, unblemished lawn is zero. The probability that debris would have been planted or that smoke would have been simulated, had this event involved the crash of a real Boeing 757, is likewise extremely low. That all of these things would have occurred if the alleged impact were contrived, however, is very high. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine any reasonable alternative. [...]

    The conclusion that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon appears to have been established beyond a reasonable doubt.




 
It’s been conclusively proven that in-flight phone calls were impossible in 2001. Why did Ted make up this story?  Or, who told him to tell these lies?  Where is Barbara now? Is it apparent to you by now that the media is a major part of the crime gang that pulled off 9/11? Are you aware that Zionist Jews with a particular agenda own most of the major corporate media and entertainment productions in this
country?
Are those incapable of contemplating the fact that the “hijackings”, planes, videos, and many of the victims
on 9/11 were a major fraud, just like the rest of the official government conspiracy theory?  It seems rather obvious to me that this is indeed the case.
We still don’t know exactly what happened on 9/11, so it would be wise to keep an open mind about everything

Speaking the truth about 9/11

Anti-Defamation League: Speaking the truth about 9/11 is anti-Semitic
Being labeled an “anti-Semite” is an honor these days.  All it means is someone who is against the Jewish criminal gang that dominates the global power structure.  In our Orwellian world, “anti-Semite” and “American patriot” are actually synonymous.  Simply accurately describing the most influential faction of the crime gang that sits atop the global power structure, which controls the United States government, media, and banking system, is anti-Semitic according to a lot of people, and that’s fine with me.  We need to continue to point out that these are the same people who did 9/11, and if that’s anti-Semitic, so be it.
Stating these obvious facts is not the most politically correct thing to do, but it needs to be said if we are ever going to regain control of our country and our future.  I get e-mail updates from the Anti-Defamation League, and in the latest e-mail I came across this article entitled, “Decade of Deceit: Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories 10 Years Later.”
Being the raging anti-Semite that I am, I was really interested in this article.  In the introduction, the ADL laments the fact that people actually know who pulled off the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOBon 9/11:

    In the ten years since the September 11 terrorist attacks on America, conspiracy theories surrounding the attacks have become an entrenched propaganda industry. These assaults on memory and history attempt to place blame for the attacks on sources other than Al Qaeda, such as the U.S. government. Prominent among such 9/11 conspiracy theories are those that make the anti-Semitic claim that Jews—whether Israeli, American, or both– were involved in planning and executing the attacks. This anti-Semitic faction is only a part of the so-called “9/11 truth movement,” yet it is vocal and pervasive, particularly on the Internet.

That’s right, it’s anti-Semitic to state the fact that the only people actually arrest on 9/11 were Jewish spies and military operatives directly from Israel.  It’s now common knowledge that federal agencies of the United States government actually uncovered an elaborate, sophisticated, and state sponsored espionage operation involving Israeli intelligence and military operatives posing as art students as a cover for engaging in espionage at numerous federal facilities, buildings, and military bases.I’d like to present the Detailed Summary (beginning on page 49) of the Gerald Shea Memo, which was prepared for the National Commission On Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission), the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and the House Permanent Committee on Intelligence in September of 2004 shortly after the 9/11 Commission released it’s report coverup:

    Set forth below is a detailed summary of the tentative conclusions reached in this memorandum, which amply illustrate the urgent need for a public inquiry into the activities of the Israeli DEA Groups and the Israeli New Jersey Group. The inquiry must include, without limitation, the examination of members of the Israel Groups and related persons; officials of the Israeli government and certain of its agencies, including Mossad; FBI suspects, agents of the DEA, the INS and the FBI; certain local law enforcement officials; agents of the CIA (in camera to the extent required); other intelligence sources cited by the public press to the extent possible; the boxes of documents and computer hard drives (referred on page 29) seized by the FBI from the Israeli New Jersey Group; and of all other relevant documents, reports, communiqués and information.–

    1. The Israeli DEA Groups were spying on the Drug Enforcement Agency and thus upon the United States. The DEA itself has concluded that they were probably engaged in organized intelligence gathering on our soil.

    2. A highly regarded American journal knowledgeable about Israeli affairs, has concluded (a) based on its own sources, that the Israeli DEA Groups were spying on radical Islamic networks suspected of links to Middle East terrorism, and (b) based on the representations of a former American intelligence official regularly briefed on these matters by law enforcement officials, that (i) at least two members of the Israeli New Jersey Group were Mossad operatives, (ii) Urban Moving, the company used by the Israeli New Jersey Group, was a front for Mossad and its operatives, and (iii) the Israeli New Jersey Group was spying on local Arabs.

    3. The intelligence sources of a substantial American television network report that the Israeli DEA Groups may have gathered information about the September 11 attacks in advance, and not shared it with the United States. One investigator said that evidence linking the Israeli DEA Groups to such intelligence gathering was classified and could not be disclosed.

    4. The Israeli DEA Groups were comprised of 125 or more Israelis operating on our soil. Their leaders and apparent associates included military commanders and experts with military backgrounds in intelligence, electronic intercepts and telecommunications.

    5. The wiretapping and intelligence expertise of members of both Israeli Groups, and the use of vans in local neighborhoods where the future hijackers were planning the attacks, and the extensive use by the hijackers of cell phones and land lines, made the Israeli Groups ideally suited to gather information regarding the hijackers’ plans.

    6. The principal operation of the Israeli DEA Groups was located in and around Hollywood, Florida, the central training and staging ground for the hijacking of North and South Tower Planes and the Pennsylvania Plane. The addresses and places of residence of the members of the Israeli DEA Groups in Hollywood itself were within hundreds of yards those of the future hijackers.

    7. The operations of both the Israeli New Jersey Group and the hijackers of the Pentagon Plane were centered in Hudson and Bergen Counties in New Jersey, within a common radius of about six miles.

    8. All five celebrating members of the Israeli New Jersey Group arrested on September 11 were aware, when the North Tower Plane struck the World Trade Center, based on their immediate reaction to the attack and the information said to be contained in their van, that the attack had been planned and carried out by Arab terrorists.

    9. After being questioned by the FBI on September 11, the leader of the Israeli New Jersey Group immediately fled the United States to Israel. His name and aliases appear, along with those of the hijackers and other FBI suspects, on the May 2002 FBI Suspect list.

    10. Israeli intelligence officials have reported that two senior officials of Mossad warned the United States in August 2001 that as many as 200 terrorists on American soil were planning an imminent large-scale attack on high visibility targets on the American mainland. One press report states that in August Mossad provided the CIA with the names of future hijackers Khaled al Mihdhar and Nawaf al Hazmi.

    11. The CIA’s explanation of how Mihdhar’s and Hazmi’s names were placed on the Watchlist through the
    spontaneous efforts of CIA and FBI agents is not only difficult to follow but, as the sole reason for the Watchlisting, hardly credible.

    12. Mossad’s own information appears to have come from its sources inside the United States. All of the facts and circumstances set forth in this memorandum appear to show that Mossad’s two likely sources of information were: (a) the Israeli DEA Groups, comparable in number to that of the Arab suspects and who appear to have tracked the future hijackers in their central places of operation and in other states, and (b) the Israeli New Jersey Group, operating through their Mossad front in another principal locus of operations of the future hijackers, two of whom were Mossad agents, and five of whom appeared immediately aware of the origin of the attacks on September 11.

    13. While little direct evidence supports the contention that the CIA was aware of or condoned the Israeli Groups’ tracking of Arab terrorist groups in the United States prior to September 11, the CIA’s pressing for the expulsion of members of the Israeli DEA Groups when they were detained before September 11, their failure to cooperate with the FBI, their circuitous explanation of how the above two hijackers were placed on the Watchlist, and other relevant considerations require that the issue be taken up as a part of
    the public inquiry into these painful events.

Pointing out these inconvenient facts is clearly anti-Semitic.  The article goes on to describe the evolving nature of anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists:

    The most prominent promoters of these anti-Semitic conspiracy theories today tend less often to be white supremacists and right-wing anti-Semites. Rather they are more commonly members of a group of anti-Israel conspiracists who see the 9/11 attacks as one of a series of “false flag” operations that Israel has carried out to manufacture a war against its Muslim enemies (the term “false flag” operations refers to acts of sabotage or terror conducted by one perpetrator but designed to appear as if conducted by another, with the goal of setting the victim at odds with the false perpetrator).

How irrational that these anti-Semites “see the 9/11 attacks as one of a series of “false flag” operations that Israel” has carried out to frame the Muslim world!  Why would anyone think that?Well, the Israelis have a long history of engaging in these sort of false flag attacks. From The Outrage: The Bombing of the King David Hotel:

    On the morning of the 22nd of July 1946 a party of between 15 and 20 Jews, dressed as an Arabs entered the King David Hotel. The hotel housed the Secretariat of the Government of Palestine and Headquarters of the British Forces in Palestine and Transjordan. The terrorists were able to enter the building without arousing too much attention because part of the building was still being used as a hotel and other people frequented it. The Jews pretended to be an Arab working party. Having unloading from their lorry several milk churns filled with 225 kilogram’s of explosive, they placed them in the basement of the wing of the hotel occupied by the Secretariat.

    A British officer standing nearby, one Major Mackintosh, became suspicious of this group of Arabs and began to ask questions, but was suddenly gunned down by a member of the Jewish gang and subsequently died. [...]

    There was no time to evacuate the building and the charge exploded with devastating effect. Many were killed instantly as the whole wing of the building collapsed about them, others were trapped and many more injured.

Remember the Lavon Affair in 1954?

    The Lavon affair (“Esek Habish” – the shameful affair) was one of the most bizarre chapters in Israeli history. In 1954, the Israeli secret service set up a spy ring in Egypt, with the purpose of blowing up US and British targets. The operation was code-named “Susanah.” The terrorist hits were to be blamed on the regime of Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser, with the purpose of alienating the US and Britain from Egypt and Nasser and somehow preventing Egyptian nationalization of the Suez canal. The ring was discovered.

    Strict censorship ensured that that the Israeli public officially knew little or nothing of the affair for many years.

Or the Israeli false flag attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, 34 killing American sailors?

    When U.S.Navy sailor Phil Tourney saw Israeli planes circling the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967, he and his crewmates thought nothing of it. The Israelis waved at the crew and the Liberty crew, waved back. The USS Liberty was a unique vessel, unlike any other in the world, with a large tower and radio dishes used for eavesdropping, so the chance it could be mistaken for an “enemy” vessel were zero. The oversize U.S. flag and the large ID numbers painted on the ship also made identification of the ship possible from miles away.

    Imagine the shock and horror when the Israelis attacked the lightly armed intelligence gathering vessel in broad daylight. A torpedo was fired and struck the Liberty dead on. Israeli aircraft strafed the men aboard and dropped napalm on the decks. Torpedo boats machine-gunned the crew as they tried to rescue wounded U.S. servicemen. The Israelis even shot up life rafts to prevent any escape.

The article goes on to describe the evolution of these anti-Semitic 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and their main talking points:

    The most popular conspiratorial allegations include the following:

    The Mossad was behind the attacks. Variations of this theory assert that the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, was behind the 9/11 attacks; the “proof” is the “five dancing Israelis” arrested on 9/11
    who were allegedly celebrating as the Twin Towers burned. Although this theory has circulated since 2001, the initial scenario painted the five Israelis as “spies” who knew that the attacks were going to happen and chose not to inform the U.S government. Over time, the theory evolved and today proponents claim that the five Israelis were actually directing the attacks and began dancing when they realized that their mission of creating a false flag operation had been accomplished.

    Jewish neo-conservatives were behind the attacks. Proponents of this theory claim that neo-conservative American officials of Jewish faith within the Bush administration, particularly Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Douglas Feith, methodically worked out a plan, with the assistance of the Mossad, to carry out the attacks in order to benefit Israel. This theory alleges that these officials orchestrated a plan well before 9/11, with the goal of invading Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries to allow the U.S. and Israel to seize control of resources and power in that area.

    The Jewish controlled media and government work to prevent the truth from emerging. The “truth” about Israeli and Jewish involvement in the 9/11 attacks will not be allowed to emerge, claim conspiracy theorists, because Jews were in charge of the 9/11 Commission report and actually control the media and government.

    In addition to these key themes, a multitude of lesser conspiracy theories also continue to circulate.
    These range from an alleged Israeli art student spy ring keeping track of the hijackers before the attacks, to Israeli companies controlling U.S telecommunications, to Jewish owners wanting to gain financially from the destruction of the World Trade Center complex.

Well, we do know that some of the Israeli spies arrested on 9/11 were Mossad operatives (and all of them appear to be former military specialists), including three of the 5 “dancing Israelis” discovered filming the attacks on 9/11. We also know that many of the neoconservatives in the Bush administration, including Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Dov Zakheim, Michael Chertoff, and others, were American Jews with direct ties to Israel, and many of them even had dual citizenship with Israel.  Many of these individuals have been alleged to have engaged in espionage for the state of Israel in the past, and were involved in publishing various policy papers advocating and preparing for a scenario that just happened to come about on 9/11.

We also know that the Jewish controlled media and U.S. government work very hard to keep the truth about 9/11 from reaching the American public.  But their propaganda efforts are extremely poor, and their effect is wearing off on the American people as more and more of us are waking up each day to these facts.

We also know that there was indeed an Israeli art student espionage and drug smuggling ring operating in the United States prior to 9/11, and that these Israeli military/intelligence operatives were actually surveilling the alleged Arab
terrorists blamed for 9/11 in addition to spying on federal agencies of the U.S. government around the country.  Further, credible sources have alleged that the Mossad was actually running the Arab hijacker patsy cell that was later blamed for the 9/11 attacks:

    British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government’s 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.

    A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated “Al Qaeda” cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.

Finally, we do in fact know that Israeli telecommunications companies control U.S. telecommunications and that the Jewish owners of the World Trade Center complex profited tremendously from the destruction of the towers on 9/11. It’s telling that the ADL article never actually disputes any of this, just labels it anti-Semitic.  How typical.  Hey Abe, your tired canards don’t work anymore




realted links
 Images of children maimed by U.S. weapons in Iraq 
american crimes in iraq by photo 
the truh of ISRAEL

Flight 77 did NOT hit the Pentagon
war on terrorism    

الجمعة، 2 سبتمبر، 2011

Ethiopian Israelis accuse state of school segregation

Ethiopian Israelis accuse state of school segregation
 
On first day of school, Petah Tikva residents say state fails to integrate their children into Israeli society, despite recent governmental moves to shut down schools with predominantly Ethiopian populations.

Haaretz

The Israeli government is perpetuating the segregation of Ethiopian children in the public school system, protesting Petah Tikva parents said on Thursday, following their decision to keep their children away from the first day of school.

The 150 demonstrators marched toward the Petah Tikvah city hall waving banners that read “No to racism, no to ghettos, no to discrimination”.

Speaking during a rally held near the city’s Ner Etzion elementary school, parents spoke against the Education Ministry’s decision to keep the school open, despite recent governmental moves to shut down schools with a predominantly Ethiopian population in order to advance the integration of children of Ethiopian descent into Israel society.

One student said at the protest that the state had not “educated me well. My dream is to be a chemistry professor but I can’t make from here,” saying: “We are being isolated so that we only study with other Ethiopians.”

The protest near the Petah Tikva school came after Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar announced earlier this week that the Education Ministry was beginning to close schools in which a significant majority of pupils are of Ethiopian origin, as a result of discrimination emerging in various schools and parent struggles over the issue.

In response to the parents’ protest, the Petah Tikva municipality said that the city had successfully relocated 120 of Ner Etzion’s 280 pupils, saying that those who had remained in the school are either new immigrants and those who specifically asked to remain there.

The Education Ministry, in turn, said that what the parents were opposing was in fact not the ministry’s unwillingness to shut the school down, but their opposition to the relocation of their children to other schools.

In explaining the move to close mostly Ethiopian schools, Sa’ar blamed on Tuesday “the creation of homogeneous schools,” as he put it, on the concentration of Ethiopian immigrants in specific neighborhoods and towns, court rejection of integration policies that had been attempted by former Education Minister Limor Livnat and racism, which “spurred other families to abandon these schools.

“I have thus instructed all the [ministry's] district directors to prepare, within a month, a multiyear plan that will fundamentally change this reality by closing down schools in which all, or the overwhelming majority, of pupils are from the Ethiopian community,” he said.

“It’s true most schools are integrated, but if there are even 20 schools and kindergartens like this, it’s a phenomenon that must be changed,” he said. “We have the cooperation of the Ethiopian community for this.

“It’s true that in certain cases, parents would prefer to have their child study in the neighborhood and avoid transportation, but, except in rare cases, it’s best for the children to be integrated,” he said.

Sa’ar’s address was interrupted by hecklers who argued that the Education Ministry had cut 10 days from the special education school schedule, but he denied this, saying that at issue was a request to add 10 more days that has not yet been approved.

In this context Sa’ar referred to the social protest, saying “Today, under the rubric of ‘the protest,’ one can say anything and get away with it…[but] personal attacks will not bend the system and change things.”

At the conference, which was sponsored by the Haaretz group of local newspapers in conjunction with the Haifa municipality, the municipality for the first time awarded an education prize to an outstanding school, and the winner was Hugim High School. The NIS 250,000 prize will be divided among the school’s teachers.

The Muslims Are Not The Enemy

The Muslims Are Not The Enemy
The Media is lying to you all the time 
 
B.A.Frémaux-Soormally says:
September 2, 2011 at 7:03 pm

The Muslims are indeed not the enemy!
FROM CHRISTIANITY, ISLAM TO THE JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER

EVERYTIME I set out to write about things I like or feel compelled to write about, my mind tells me that I am writing the ultimate truth. Yet, the more I read and research, the more truths I uncover, sometimes even improving or correcting the “truth” I previously accepted.

WHEN I returned from the U.S.S.R. in January 1968, I was free, so I thought, to finally read extensively at home as I never found time or had the will to visit the local colonial municipal CARNEGIE Library and was limited to my father’s quite rich private library who none of my older sisters and brothers seem to be interested in. My father had several huge encyclopaedia size books hand written by him in beautiful Urdu script, but the colonial public school system never taught us the Urdu language that would have enabled us to read them. As soon as I went into teaching – some French and Mathematics, but mainly Biology, Physics, Chemistry, Human and Social Biology and Agricultural science, I started visiting the American Embassy in order to read books, magazines and newspapers (some of which were even given free) not available elsewhere, not yet realising that the reading material was carefully selected and had only one purpose: indoctrination through manipulation and mind control.

YET, I managed to read in between the lines as well while others swallowed every bit of material that was made available to them as Gospel Truth. I started to study myself, my family, the people around me, the colonised nation and the world as a whole. What I discovered was a monstrosity that would have driven many completely mad. One of the first 200 page books I read was from Freud to Kinsey. I immediately saw the fraud without yet identifying it as being Jewish or Jewish engineered or controlled. Our own family doctor was a White European type person, Dr Harel, but it never came to our mind to ask if he was Jewish. My parents may have known that he was a practicing Catholic, but today I am asking myself if he was not just another Crypto-Jew.

ONLY later I came to understand that what Dr Harel and most other official doctors were practicing was not medicine, but just selling (prescribing) Jewish Corporate Pharmaceuticals that often poison while rarely prevent or cure any human ailment, which more often has social and spiritual causes and do not require any chemical re-adjustment or bombardment. I started studying human behaviour and found out that we were all being controlled by Corporations, Jews (I did not say Zionists), Freemasons, perverts, Godless despots posing as Christians and even Muslims.

WHEN I learned about all the lies I was taught about WWI, WWII, the Russian Jewish Bolshevik Revolution, the Freemasonic French Revolution, Napoleon and so on, I saw how one could get easily misled, but I still did not understand why so many (most of us) could be so easily misled. I studied some works by Pavlov and later I found out Western mad scientists, CIA and other diabolical agencies were experimenting on animals and even using their own people as guinea pigs in order to find out ways how to not only enslave the masses, control them but also MAKE THEM WILLING SLAVES all their lives! I also found out that modern technology is given to the people only by trickle while the military kept most of the discoveries secret and as weapons against the masses and the nations.

BRAINWASHING was a Soviet weapon of control, we were told by the Western media for the most part of the XXth century. But, the truth is that while the Soviets were practising a kind of brainwashing on its conquered territory representing some one sixth of the globe, the West was practising the worst kind of brainwashing on almost half of the conquered world, including Hindustan, Japan, Africa and Indonesia. Muslims would have been rightly perceived as the enemy when some Muslim army were at the doors of Vienna, but let be be honest and more serious about the facts of history. Muslims did not start WWI, WWII, the Russian Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, the American War of Independence, the Vietnam War, the Korean and Japanese Wars, the Opium Wars, the Hiroshima-Nagasaki bombings, the genocidal wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Palestine, did not murder ten million Congolese, “six million” Jews, 1.5 million Armenians, 66 million Soviets, 3 million Cambodians, and so on.

SO, where did the West and its Allies get this “Muslims and Islam are the enemy”? From which Gospel did some Christians read this myth? Those Christians, instead of extending a charitable Christian hand to their Believing Brothers and Sisters in the same God, they found excuse after excuse not only not to do so allowing millions of them to be slaughtered like cattle, to be tortured, imprisoned, humiliated and persecuted, but also to add insult to the injury by telling lies about both Islam and Muslims in general. One day they will have to stop because the War is not only against Islam and Muslims but also against Christianity and authentic Christians who refuse the Jewish and Atheist diktat on their nations and churches.

I AM sad to see right here on The Ugly Truth that instead of preaching the universal sisterhood and brotherhood of humans, a few Bible thumpers are still writing lies about Islam and Muslims. I sent pictures of burnt and mutilated bodies of Muslims from Gujarat, the Balkans, Algeria, Lebanon, Afghanistan and the deformed babies of Iraq to the Prime Minister of Mauritius and to the Catholic Diocese of Port-Louis because they were supporting Israel, India, the UK, France and the US, but I did not receive even any acknowledgement. We have too few people of real compassion, too few people who really worship the GOD OF LOVE AND MERCY.
YES, MUSLIMS ARE NOT THE ENEMY
 
realted  link

المشاركات الشائعة